Thursday, December 19, 2013

Caltha’s Quarterly E-newsletter on EH&S Compliance and Environmental Assessment

 

Air Quality – Air Permitting

 
EPA has approved revisions to the Wisconsin State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) in 2008. WDNR submitted revisions exempting certain sources of air pollution from construction permit requirements…
 
On November 30, 2012, EPA published the proposed rule, "Reconsideration of Certain New Source and Startup/Shutdown Issues: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coal- and Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards…
 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued updates to its oil and natural gas standards for storage tanks, in response to petitions for reconsideration of the 2012 New Source Performance Standards for Oil and Natural Gas Production. The updates will…
 
EPA has approved portions of the North Dakota State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission that demonstrate that North Dakota meets certain interstate transport requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2006 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) …
 
US EPA has initiated the reconsideration of recent changes to prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) regulations, which expects to complete by June 2014. This rulemaking is in response to the January 22, 2013, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.…
 
 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed Clean Air Act standards to reduce carbon emissions from new power plants. Under the proposal, new large natural gas-fired turbines would need to meet a limit of 1,000 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour…
 
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed two rules to reduce exposure to formaldehyde, as required under a Federal law passed by Congress in 2010. These rules ensure that composite wood products produced domestically or imported…
 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to approve revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the state of Iowa. The purpose of these revisions is to update the Polk County Board of Health Rules and Regulations. These proposed revisions…
 
EPA is withdrawing a direct rule it had published in the Federal Register on February 15, 2013, to revise the definition of VOCs for purposes of preparing SIPs to attain the NAAQS for ozone under title I of the CAA. EPA published a direct final rule that excluded …
 

Wastewater – Water Quality

 
EPA is proposing rules that would require electronic reporting in place of the current paper-based NPDES reports. The proposed regulation would require permittees and regulators to use existing, available information technology to electronically report information and…
 
The Minnesota Depart of Health (MDH), Health Risk Assessment Unit has adopted revisions to the Rules relating to health risk limits (HRL) for groundwater standards in the Minnesota. The amendments add (to Part 4717.7860 of the rule) health-based guidance values for…
 
In response to a 2009 Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that vacated the 2006 NPDES Pesticides Rule, EPA has revised regulations to remove language added by the that rule. This language had exempted the application of pesticides from National Pollutant…
 
EPA has reached an agreement with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) to make changes to Iowa’s Clean Water Act (CWA) permit and compliance program for concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). The agreement includes specific actions.…
 

Hazardous Material Management & Transport

 
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) has proposed to amend the hazardous materials procedural rules to prohibit a person who fails to pay a civil penalty as ordered, or fails to abide by a payment agreement, from performing activities.…
 
In this final rule, EPA requires facilities to report non-trade-secret Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) forms to EPA using electronic software provided by the agency. The final rule is effective on January 21, 2014. The only exception to this electronic reporting requirement…
 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has modified the hazardous waste management regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to conditionally exclude solvent-contaminated wipes from hazardous waste regulations…
 
US EPA has initiated rulemaking to process to add to the list of Categorical Non-Waste Fuels (Non-Hazardous Secondary Material). In the 2013 Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM) final rule, the Agency established a rulemaking process for categorical…
 
EPA has updated its list of industrial codes of operations which may be subject to Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) reporting under EPCRA 313. (also referred to as Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) In general, section 313.…
 

Stormwater Permitting & Compliance

 
The California State Water Board staff has released an updated analysis of the compliance costs for the proposed Industrial General Permit (2013 Final Draft IGP) This updates the prior analysis released in 2012. To conduct the 2013 cost update facilities were…
 
As part of ongoing federal and state efforts to restore Puget Sound, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has announced it is implementing focused enforcement actions in Seattle-area looking at companies discharging industrial stormwater to Puget Sound.…
 

Product Stewardship– Product Responsibility

 
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) has added more than 130 chemicals to its Safer Chemical Ingredients List, including 119 fragrance chemicals for commercial and consumer cleaning products. The Safer Chemical Ingredients list was created in.…
 
As part of ongoing efforts to promote the design and use of safer chemicals, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a draft report on alternatives to a flame retardant chemical, hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), which has persistent.…
 
EPA issued a proposed rule on June 10, 2013 concerning a third-party certification framework for the formaldehyde standards for composite wood products. The comment period for this proposed rule has been extended from August 9, 2013 to August 26, 2013…
 

Environmental Due Diligence

 
In advance of the revised ASTM standard being finalized, EPA has proposed to amend the Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries to reference ASTM International's E1527-13 "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I…
 
EPA withdrawn a direct final rule National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; Revision to Increase Public Availability of the Administrative Record File because the agency received an adverse comment on the rule. The rule, which was …
 

Environmental Review – Impact Assessment

 
Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) have published a final rule revising some of their Environmental review and Related Procedures. This final rule makes revisions to the joint FTA and FHWA regulations that implement the…
 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced it will begin assessments on 23 commonly used chemicals, with a specific focus on flame retardant chemicals. These assessments are part of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Work Plan which…
 
 


Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at: Email: info@calthacompany.com Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/


Saturday, November 30, 2013

Phase 1 and 2 Site Assessments In Wisconsin Using Revised ASTM Standard Method

Caltha LLP conducts Phase 1 environmental assessments for lenders, buyers, sellers and prospective tenants across Wisconsin. [use this link to review summaries of Caltha LLP site assessment projects] The revised ASTM "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process" has been published in final form in November 2013. Caltha LLP is now conducting all Phase 1 ESAs for our work in Wisconsin using the revised standard.

Two of the key requirements that are significantly different compared to previous versions of this standard are:
  1. Requirement for physical review of agency file. If relevant information which may be useful in the assessment is only accessible in agency files, then a file review needs to be conducted.
  2. The standard now specifies three different categories for Recognized Environmental Conditions:
    • ASTM E 1527-13 defines recognized environmental conditions the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.
    • A historical recognized environmental condition is a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls.
    • A controlled recognized environmental condition is a recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls.
Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at: Email: info@calthacompany.com Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/


Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Wisconsin Safety Management System Consultant - Certified Safety Auditor

Using a systems approach is the cornerstone of a company’s safety management process. The internationally recognized system to achieve this outcome is the OHSAS 18001 Safety Management System (SMS) Standard. The efficacy of this process approach comes from relying on the use of certified third-party auditors to assure that all elements of a company’s SMS includes and embraces this standard set of requirements.

Caltha LLP offers the expertise needed to assist our Wisconsin clients in developing and implementing a safety management system that meets the requirements set out in OHSAS 18001. This service ranges from helping the client understand the requirements to conform to and self-certify that they meet the requirements all the way to achieving certification by the international body and their registered third-party auditors that their SMS meets the Standard’s rigorous requirements.

Caltha LLP’s full service OHSAS 18001 program includes assistance in developing, implementing, and internally auditing an SMS to assure that all elements of the Standard have been met. This activity also includes providing training packages and the training needed to accomplish the desired goals. This service is provided by people who have developed and implemented single site and multi-site programs that have achieved certification and further, are RAB certified OHSAS 18001 Lead Auditors who have the background to assist with or conduct internal audits.

Caltha LLP provides expert EH&S consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective EH&S compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at: Email: info@calthacompany.com Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/


Monday, May 13, 2013

Application of Lead Paint Rule To Wisconsin Public & Commercial Buildings

US EPA has announced that it will conduct a public meeting on June 26, 2013 to gather public comment regarding extending its Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program to public and commercial buildings. In 2010, EPA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) concerning renovation, repair, and painting activities in public and commercial buildings.

EPA is in the process of determining whether these activities create lead-based paint hazards, and, for those that do, developing certification, training, and work practice requirements as directed by the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). EPA has also reopened the comment period for the December 31, 2012 Federal Register document to allow for additional data and other information to be submitted by the public and interested stakeholders. EPA specifically requested information on the following:
1. The manufacture, sale, and uses of lead-based paint after 1978.
2. The use of lead-based paint on public and commercial buildings.
3. The frequency and extent of renovations of public and commercial buildings.
4. Work practices used to renovate public and commercial buildings.
5. Dust generation and transportation from exterior and interior renovations of public and commercial buildings.

Click here for further background on the application of the LBP Rule to public and commercial buildings

Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com   
Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/



Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Changes To Penalties For Knowing Violation To Hazardous Material Shipping Rules

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) is revising the references in its regulations to the maximum and minimum civil penalties for a knowing violation of the Federal hazardous material transportation law or a regulation, order, special permit, or approval issued under that law.

In "Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act" (MAP-21), Congress revised the maximum and minimum civil penalties for a knowing violation of the Federal hazardous material transportation law or a regulation, order, special permit, or approval issued under that law. These changes to the civil penalty amounts apply to violations occurring on or after October 1, 2012. In response, PHMSA is revising  the maximum and minimum civil penalty amounts in its regulations  as follows:
  • Revising the maximum civil penalty from $55,000 to $75,000 for a person who knowingly violates the Federal hazardous material transportation law or a regulation, order, special permit, or approval issued under that law.
  • Revising the maximum civil penalty from $110,000 to $175,000 for a person who knowingly violates the Federal hazardous material transportation law or a regulation, order, special permit, or approval issued under that law that results in death, serious illness, or severe injury to any person or substantial destruction of the property.
  • Removing the current $250 minimum civil penalty and revising the minimum penalty amount to $450 for a violation related to training.
Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at: Email: info@calthacompany.com
Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/



Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Potential New TRI Reporting Chemical For Wisconsin Toxic Release Inventory

Under a recently proposed rule change, Wisconsin facilities that are subject to annual Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) reporting may need to review their use of an additional chemical. EPA is proposing to add ortho-nitrotoluene (o-nitrotoluene) to the list of chemicals subject to reporting under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and section 6607 of the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA).

o-Nitrotoluene has been classified by the National Toxicology Program in their 12th Report on Carcinogens as "reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen." EPA believes that o-nitrotoluene meets the EPCRA section 313(d)(2)(B) criteria because it can reasonably be anticipated to cause cancer in humans. Based on EPA’s review of the available production and use information, the agency believes that o-nitrotoluene is expected to be manufactured, processed, or otherwise used in quantities that would exceed the EPCRA section 313 reporting thresholds. Comments on the proposed addition of o-Nitrotoluene to the list of TRI chemicals must be received on or before May 13, 2013.

Click here for further background on the addition of o-nitrotoluene and the criteria for adding chemicals to the Section 313 list of chemicals.

Caltha LLP is an EH&S consultant providing specialized expertise to clients in Wisconsin in the preparing and submitting annual toxic release inventory reports, and preparing cost-effective chemical tracking procedures.
For further information contact Caltha LLP at info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP Website


Thursday, March 7, 2013

Draft Guidance On Antidegradation For WPDES Permits To Impaired Waters

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has released its draft guidance document “TMDL Development and Implementation Guidance: Integrating the WPDES and Impaired Waters Programs” for a 21-day public comment period. In addition to providing a framework for developing and implementing permit limits for discharges to 303d listed impaired waters, the draft guidance also addresses the WDNR approach to antidegradation requirements.

Under the draft guidance, if the new TMDL-derived limit results in an increase in an effective existing limit in a permit, then an antidegradation evaluation is needed. These limitations are no different than other water quality-based effluent limitations with respect to antidegradation. For example, the initial imposition of a water quality-based effluent limit, which include TMDL-derived limits, does not require an antidegradation evaluation as long as the pollutant of concern was previously present in the discharge and the permittee is not proposing an increased load to the receiving water .

According to the WDNR, possible exceptions include the initial imposition of a TMDL-derived limit for a discharge to Exceptional and Outstanding Resource Waters, for a bioaccumulative chemical of concern such as mercury when an increased discharge is proposed, and when a change in discharge location is proposed. With a few exceptions, Wisconsin chapter NR 207 requires an antidegradation evaluation when a new or increased discharge is proposed. Therefore, an antidegradation evaluation is necessary before a TMDL-derived limit, which has been incorporated into a WPDES permit and has become effective, is increased or the TMDL-derived limit replaces a less restrictive effective effluent limit.

Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com
Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/



Thursday, January 17, 2013

Summary of TRI Surface Water Releases To Great Lakes In 2011

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s annual Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) report releases of EPCRA Section 313 reportable chemicals into surface waters in the Great Lakes Basin increased by 12 % from 2010 to 2011. Nitrates and pesticides from municipal wastewater treatment plants and agriculture account for most of the releases from surface water discharges to the Great Lakes Basin. Nitrates were also discharged by primary metals facilities, such as iron and steel mills and smelters, and food and beverage manufacturers.

For the summary, the Great Lakes Basin consists of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, Erie and Ontario; a number of other smaller lakes and waterways; and the surrounding watershed. The watershed covers parts of Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and parts of Ontario in Canada. Despite increases from 2010 to 2011, overall Section 313 releases in the Great Lakes Basin have decreased about 40 % since 2003 and are currently at the second-lowest level in a decade. Surface water, air and land releases in the basin increased by 12, 1 and 4 % respectively, while underground injection decreased 5 % from 2010 to 2011.

Read summary of national EPCRA TRI releases for 2011.

Facilities in Wisconsin must report their Section 313 chemical releases to EPA under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA 313) by the beginning of July each year. The Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 also requires information on waste management activities related to TRI chemicals. Caltha provides technical support to facilities nationwide to determine if they have processed or otherwise used Section 313 chemicals above reporting thresholds, and if so, to assist in the preparation of Form R TRI reports.

Do you miss submitting your 2011 TRI report, which was due on July 1, 2012? Contact Caltha to discuss options for submitting late Form R Toxic Release Inventory.


Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/




Saturday, December 29, 2012

PM2.5 Attainment Determination For Milwaukee Racine, Wisconsin Area

EPA has proposed to determine that the Milwaukee-Racine, Wisconsin area had attained the 2006 24-hour fine particle (2006 PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and to more clearly explain EPA's interpretation on the applicability of CFR 51.1004(c) to the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.

As background, on April 24, 2012, EPA published a proposed determination that the Milwaukee-Racine, Wisconsin area had attained the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA received comments on the original proposal suggesting that the suspension of certain Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements cannot be applied in this instance because it only pertains to the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS and not to the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. As a result, EPA has reproposed portion of the original proposed determination to address this issue. EPA plans to address all comments received on the original proposal and the current reproposal in the Federal Register final notice. Comments must be received on or before January 28, 2013.

Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com
Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/



Proposed Approval of Wisconsin GHG Permitting Approach

EPA has proposed to approve revisions to the Wisconsin State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) to EPA on May 4, 2011, June 20, 2012, and September 28, 2012. The proposed revisions modify Wisconsin's Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program to establish appropriate emission thresholds for determining which new stationary sources and modification projects become subject to Wisconsin's PSD permitting requirements for their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

WDNR had proposed to defer  the application of the PSD permitting requirements to biogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from bioenergy and other biogenic stationary sources in Wisconsin until July 21, 2014. EPA is proposing approval of Wisconsin's revisions because the Agency has made the preliminary determination that these revisions are in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA regulations regarding PSD permitting for GHGs.

Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com
Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/


Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Sewer Overflow Rules Approved By Wisconsin NRB

The Wisconsin Natural Resources Board has approved rules addressing untreated sanitary sewer overflows. Current state and federal law make sewage overflows into lakes and rivers illegal. However, some exceptions are allowed under current rules. The rule revisions update Wisconsin’s regulations to be more consistent with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s regulatory approach regarding sanitary sewerage overflows. The revised rules, found in Natural Resources Chapters 110, 205, 208 and 210, will now go to lawmakers for their review.

The revised rules prohibit sanitary sewer overflows, and create a consistent set of factors that will be used to determine when and what enforcement will occur if there is noncompliance with this prohibition. The rules also require every sewage collection system owner to develop and implement a capacity, management, operation and maintenance program to reduce the amount of rain and melting snow that enters their sewerage system. The rule requires public notification, consistent with the system’s emergency response plan, using the most effective and efficient communications available in the community including at a minimum, notifying a daily newspaper by written or electronic communication when a sanitary sewer overflow occurs, so that the public is aware of overflows that may present a health risk.

The rule also creates a process where DNR may approve permit conditions wherein a municipality may implement certain practices, such as blending, that allow efficient operations at the sewage treatment plant, but do not allow permit effluent limitations to be exceeded.


Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/


Wednesday, December 19, 2012

EPA Action Proposed On WDNR SIP For PM2.5

EPA is proposing to disapprove a revision to Wisconsin's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) in a letter dated May 12, 2011. The revision concerns permitting requirements relating to particulate matter of less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5). EPA is proposing to disapprove the revisions because they do not meet the 2008 PM2.5 SIP requirements.

On May 12, 2011, Wisconsin requested a revision to its SIP to include new permit requirements relating to PM2.5. The provisions were designed to match the requirements set forth in the May 2008 and October 2010 rules. The submittal included permanent rules to define major source thresholds and significant emission increase levels; establish the SMC for PM2.5; establish interpollutant trading ratios for PM2.5, sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOX); and clarify existing nonattainment area permitting rules.

On July 21, 2011, EPA announced a change in its policy concerning the development and adoption of interpollutant trading provisions for PM2.5. The new policy requires that any ratio involving PM2.5 precursors submitted to EPA for approval for use in a state's interpollutant offset program for PM2.5 nonattainment areas must be accompanied by a technical demonstration that shows the net air quality benefits of such a ratio for the PM2.5 nonattainment area in which it will be applied. In a letter dated March 5, 2012, WDNR requested to withdraw its request to have NR 408.06(1)(cm), the provision pertaining to interpollutant trading ratios, included in its 2011 submittal. EPA has evaluated WDNR's proposed revisions to the Wisconsin SIP in accordance with the Federal requirements governing state permitting programs.

EPA is proposing to disapprove these revisions because they do not meet all the requirements of the 2008 rules. According to EPA, Wisconsin's current SIP does not contain the explicit language to account for PM2.5 and PM10 condensables in permitting decisions, as codified in 51.166(b)(49)(vi) and 40 CFR 52.21(b)(50)(vi), and to date, the State has not made a submission with such revisions. EPA is proposing to disapprove the revisions to Wisconsin rules NR 400, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408 and 484, submitted by the State on May 12, 2011, for approval into the SIP. The full or partial disapproval of a SIP revision triggers the requirement under section 110(c) that EPA promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) no later than two years from the date of the disapproval unless the state corrects the deficiency, and the Administrator approves the plan or plan revision before the Administrator promulgates such FIP.

Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com
Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/




Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Statewide General Wetland Permit

The general permit WDNR deleloped to streamline the wetland permitting process for some residential, commercial and industrial projects impacting wetlands is now effective. The statewide general permit (“GP”) is required under a new State law passed in 2012. It enables people who have a project resulting in the unavoidable filling of up to 10,000 square feet of wetland to get their permit decision more quickly if the project meets the standards and conditions in the general permit. Previously, all landowners wanting to pursue projects that involve wetland fill were required to seek an individual permit and lengthier environmental review. Projects that involve more than 10,000 square feet of wetland fill or do not meet the GP standards and conditions continue to require a wetland individual permit, which has a longer process time, a higher permit fee, and require wetland mitigation and a higher level of environmental review.

The general permit for smaller projects identifies the location, design, and construction standards and other conditions any project must meet to qualify for the general permit, and to ensure that minimal environmental effects occur. The general permit is valid statewide for 5 years. When property owners’ projects apply to be covered under the general permit, DNR is required to issue a decision within 30 days.

Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com
Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/




Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Final Rule Disapproval For WDNR Air Regulation

US EPA has published a final rule which disapproves portions of the Wisconsin State Implementation Plan (SIP) for control of particulate matter under the Clean Air Act (CAA).

WDNR submitted a comment letter to EPA disagreeing with its proposed disapproval of portions of the WNDR infrastructure SIP for the 2006 PM2.5. Wisconsin argued that its infrastructure SIP submissions have clearly stated that WDNR has the resources and authorities necessary to implement and satisfy the requirements of the CAA for PM2.5 and PM10. Citing the definition of ‘‘regulated NSR air contaminant’’ in Wisconsin Administrative Code NR 405.02(25i) as including ‘‘any contaminant for which a national ambient air quality standard has been promulgated and any constituents or precursors for the air contaminant identified by the administrator,’’ WDNR believed that it has been applying the PSD program in accordance with the explicit identification of precursor(s) to PM2.5 and ozone. WDNR also noted that it has been accounting for condensable particulate matter in its PSD permitting program since the beginning of the program.

In disapproving the Wisconsin program, EPA final rulemaking referenced Wisconsin’s definition of ‘‘regulated NSR air contaminant’’ as providing generic language to define what constitutes a regulated NSR pollutant; however, EPA concluded that the State’s current rules do not contain provisions that would directly account for PM2.5 and its precursors in NSR permitting. Because Wisconsin has not yet made these required revisions after issue of the proposed rule, EPA is finalizing a disapproval of this narrow portion of Wisconsin’s infrastructure SIP for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS with respect to the explicit identification of PM2.5 precursors.

Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com
Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/



Tuesday, October 9, 2012

New NEPA Reporting System Released

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced the release of e-NEPA, a new online system that allows federal agencies to submit environmental impact statements (EISs) electronically. Beginning on October 1, 2012, all agencies are required to use the e-NEPA filing system. Traditionally, EISs have been submitted to EPA in hard copy. e-NEPA eliminates the need to mail or deliver copies of EISs to EPA headquarters, reducing printing, shipping, and delivery costs. EPA also belives it will save time through electronic filing and e-confirmation and improves transparency, allowing EPA to post EIS documents to EPA’s website.

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to integrate environmental considerations into their decision-making processes by identifying the environmental impacts and reasonable alternatives to their proposed actions. To meet NEPA requirements federal agencies prepare detailed analyses known as EISs. EPA reviews, provides comments, and maintains a national filing system for EISs.

Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/




Thursday, August 30, 2012

Brownfields Grants To Restore Contaminated Sites In Madison

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has awarded EPA brownfields grants totaling $800,000 to clean up contaminated properties in Madison, Wisconsin. The grants include:

  • $400,000 to clean up a former automotive sales and repair site on East Washington Avenue. The City will provide another $80,000 toward the cleanup.
  • $400,000 to conduct environmental assessments and plan future cleanups in the surrounding area. The City of Madison previously received a $400,000 cleanup grant for the East Washington property from WDNR’s brownfield revolving loan program, which is also funded by EPA.

Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com
Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/




Wisconsin Great Lakes Restoration Grants To Reduce Bacteria Levels

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has awarded two Great Lakes Restoration Initiative grants, totaling over $1 million, to improve water quality at Great Lakes beaches in Wisconsin. Projects awarded grant funding include:

  • $1 million (two grants of $500,000 each) to the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh to redesign eight Wisconsin beaches to reduce bacteria levels, resulting in fewer swimming bans and beach closures. The beaches are: Red Arrow Park Beach, Marinette; Crescent Beach, Algoma; Red Arrow Park Beach, Manitowoc; Thompson West End Park, Washburn; Grant Park, South Milwaukee; Samuel Myers Park, Racine; and Simmons Island and Eichelman Parks, Kenosha.

Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at: Email: info@calthacompany.com Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/




Monday, August 27, 2012

Construction Site SWPPP, Erosion Control, Spill Control Consultant Services


In Wisconsin, landowners of most construction projects where one or more acres of land will be disturbed must submit an application called a Water Resource Application for Project Permits (WRAPP) (equivalent to a Notice of Intent or NOI) to request coverage under the Construction Site Storm Water Runoff General Permit No. WI-S067831. A landowner is any person holding fee title, an easement or other interest in the property that allows the person to undertake land disturbing construction activity on the property. Construction sites subject to the WDNR general permit  must meet certain minimum best management practices, including site inspections, waste control, employee training, Spill control or  SPCC Plan and others.

The landowner also has the responsibility to oversee development of a site-specific erosion control and storm water management plan and the installation, maintenance, and inspection of all best management practices (BMPs). These BMPs include structural and non-structural measures, practices, techniques or devices used to avoid or minimize soil, sediment or pollutants carried in runoff to waters of the state.

Add Caltha to your project team - Caltha LLP  is a SWPPP consultant and provides technical support to general contractors, project developers and land owners in Wisconsin to prepare project pollution prevention plans and the WRAPP required for permit coverage. To request a quote, click here

Caltha will need you to provide basic project descriptions (e.g. size, scope) along with your contact information. We will then issue a quote by email, usually within 24-hrs.

You can find out more about Caltha’s stormwater services at:


 

Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com
Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/




Tuesday, July 31, 2012

EPA Approves WDNR Phosphorus Control Program NR 217

US EPA has approved the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) program to control the discharge of phosphorus to surface waters. Wisconsin adopted the new subchapter, Wisconsin Administrative Code Chapter NR 217, Subtitle III, “Water Quality Based Effluent Limitations for Phosphorus,” in 2010, but EPA did not approve it until July 25, 2012.

WDNR's program will allow permit holders (such as publically owned treatment works, or POTW) to meet phosphorus discharge requirements through partnership arrangements with others who release phosphorus. Permit holders can make such arrangements to achieve phosphorus reductions more economically. This will allow communities and other permit holders to save money while still ensuring overall phosphorus levels are reduced in the watershed.

Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Wisconsin to obtain air and wastewater permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to develop cost effective compliance programs.
For further information, contact Caltha LLP at:
Email: info@calthacompany.com Website: http://www.calthacompany.com/